RE: Benefits of Sub-procedures

["Bob cozzi" <cozzi@xxxxxxxxx>]

Joe,
Okay, that's fine, but isn't it then more work to go back and change all the
proc names in both the procedure interface and the prototype... I suppose
I'm advocating reasons to justify using Prototypes and a Wizard to generate
them over cut/paste.  Both are good, and at least you're using them!


Bob Cozzi
Cozzi Consulting
www.rpgiv.com


-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Joe Pluta
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 11:47 PM
To: 'RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries'
Subject: RE: Benefits of Sub-procedures

> From: Bob cozzi
> 
> >>So does WDSCi51!  However, while I don't know about everybody else,
> >>there are often times when it's a lot faster for me to clone an
existing
> >>procedure than go through the wizard.
>
> That's because the wizard in WDSC proc wizard isn't very good.

Nah, it's just because I type for a living and I can actually type much
faster than point and click.  Let's say I have a method with four
parameters that I want to clone and change one of the parameters.  It's
a LOT easier for me to block copy and change the one variable than to go
through a wizard.

But that's just me.

Joe

_______________________________________________
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.