Re: Benefits of Sub-procedures

[G Armour <garmour400r@xxxxxxxxx>]

Not sure whether I was misinterpreted.  I was intending to extend your idea of
forgoing all subroutines "for two to three months just to get into practice." 
Sometimes I need to be "coerced" like that.  <g>

By the BTW:  Enforcing this "no subroutines" idea would almost have to take into
account existing apps that have myriad SR's.  The pre-compiler option could 
look at
the source statement mod date and kick out those with a higher date than... 

Like I have nothing better to do.   <g>

GA

--- rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I think that what you are saying is that if it's so simplistic that you 
> don't want to bother with PI's/PR's then you wouldn't want to bother with 
> BEGSR's/EXSR's.  Interesting thought.
> 
> By the way, I compiled a very simple program with a subroutine in it just 
> to see if it generated any messages like RNF#### - list of subroutines. 
> Nothing.  Too bad, if there was I bet you could have CHGMSGD and kicked up 
> the severity to a higher number.  And that would have stopped the 
> compiler.  I bet that's a technique not published in "How to Win Friends 
> and Influence People".      :-)
> 
> Rob Berendt


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com