RE: Benefits of Sub-procedures

["Chevalier, Rick" <Rick.Chevalier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yeah, I just saw it.  Maybe I should start today over.  It should be
objects instead of arguments.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Saunders, Martin P [mailto:martin.saunders@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:34 AM
> To: 'RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries'
> Subject: RE: Benefits of Sub-procedures
> 
> 
> Glad you cleared that one up Rick!
> 
> 
> Oops,  the last paragraph should have read:
> 
> I'm not advocating staying with  program calls over service programs I
> just don't see reducing the number of arguments as a valid reason to
> switch.
> 
> > 
> > I'm not advocating staying with  program calls over service 
> programs I
> > just don't see reducing the number of arguments as a valid reason to
> > switch.
> 
> 
> =======================================================
> This message contains information that may be privileged or 
> confidential and is the property of the Cap Gemini Ernst & 
> Young Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is 
> addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, youare not 
> authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, 
> distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you 
> receive this message in error, please notify the sender 
> immediately and delete all copies of this message.
> =======================================================
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) 
> mailing list
> To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
> or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
>