|
Robert, sorry, i was blind - you did include field sizes and I just didn't see them. in the 1 step example, this portion of your expression: %dec(transno:%size(transNo):0) + 1 ...evaluates to an 11s0 field. The reason is that a transno of 9,999,999,999 + 1 would equal 10,000,000,000 and the intermediate workfield created by the %dec() bif must be large enough for the maximum this value could be. my advice is to create a subprocedure and define the 'wrk' field there. hth, rick
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.