RE: Function Opinion

[rob@xxxxxxxxx]

Then don't use CL.

Rob Berendt
-- 
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary 
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." 
Benjamin Franklin 




Marco Facchinetti <facchinetti@xxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
10/15/2003 12:38 PM
Please respond to
RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
RE: Function Opinion






I like the idea:

1 source = 1 module = 1 service pgm (and 1 copy member for
prototypes)

but what about CL? I can handle many sub procs in an RPG
source but I cannot with CL.

Marco
--- "Bartell, Aaron L. (TC)" <ALBartell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> I agree. 
> 
> In our shop we do the one module to one service program
> way with potentially
> many sub procs in each module.  Not that we think
> multiple modules in a
> service program is bad, it has just worked out this way
> for us so far.  It
> really comes down to having somebody oversee all
> development and then make
> sure all related modules get bound together in a
> appropriately named service
> program.


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.