|
> There are a few details you've yet to consider, Buck. Absolutely! > Let me get this right: > You believe that > > 1) name=getName(object, whatEverKey) > > is SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER than: > > 2) name=getName("Vendor", whatEverKey) > 3) name=getVendorName(VendorKey) > > When 2 and 3 are available as of a few releases ago?? Yes, I do. Because I would be able to construct more generic assembly/disassembly routines. Driven by the data instead of needing a giant SELECT/WHEN group. Being able to code one function call to extract or insert any name in an XML/HTML/EDI stream instead of many function calls saves time which is money. Although your variant 2 is quite close to that, and is what I tend to use now. > PLEASE don't try to convince me #1 is easier, > and saves time and money, unless you wanna > debate the article I referred to. My only intent was to demonstrate an actual business use for overloading. I'm not at all trying to say that function overloading is the be-all and end-all of programming. Just that it does have a place in the pantheon. --buck
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.