× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Excellent explanation, Hans!  And right along the lines that I was thinking of.

Still, I wonder (but don't doubt your word) why the compiler can't "see" that 
the
field-length prefix isn't being set.  Maybe easier, if it isn't even being
referenced?  

I told my colleagues not to lose too many brain cells on this; just use the 
EVAL and
life will be good.

Thanks again!
GA

--- Hans Boldt <boldt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip> 
> I think this is largely a case of "working as designed".
> 
> To summarise the rules: When using varying length variables within 
> the traditional fixed-form calcs (not the expression calcs), a 
> varying length variable works the same as a fixed length field 
> defined with the current length. That is, if the current length of a 
> char varying field is 10 (regardless of the declared maximum 
> length), then the operation works the same as is the field were 
> fixed length 10 chars.
> 
> Of course, if the current length is 0, then there's not really an 
> analogue in the fixed length case. But we're not going to make any 
> change to the compiler that might possibly regress users, and so 
> that behavior ain't gonna change.
> 
> Why this way? The rules for char result on the old fixed-form calcs 
> get in the way of meaningful rules for varying length variables. For 
> example, for many fixed-form opcodes, char results are generally 
> unpadded and right adjusted. Just how exactly do you right-adjust a 
> value in a varying length result? We settled on the current rules 
> for fixed-form calcs since you get the results you generally expect 
> in the expression calcs anyways, and we wanted to keep the rules 
> consistent for all fixed-form calcs.
> 
> Regarding a warning (sev 10) message, I can't think of any warning 
> that would specifically warn about this situation. The compiler 
> generally can't know that a varying length variable never gets its 
> length set.
> 
> Cheers! Hans


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.