Re: QCMDEXC on v5r1

[rob@xxxxxxxxx]

Can you get that to work?  Because the error message sure seems to point 
to that.

Rob Berendt
-- 
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary 
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." 
Benjamin Franklin 





"Joep  Beckeringh" <joep.beckeringh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
08/20/2003 04:52 PM
Please respond to RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries
 
        To:     "RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries" 
<rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
        cc: 
        Fax to: 
        Subject:        Re: QCMDEXC on v5r1


Rob,

CONST is not really passed to QCMDEXC. The prototype is only informing the
compiler that the called program will not change the parameter, thereby
allowing the compiler to use a temporary variable to pass to QCMDEXC. That
gives you the option to use a literal or an expression instead of a
variable.

Joep Beckeringh


----- Original Message -----
From: <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries" <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: QCMDEXC on v5r1


> Can you really pass CONST to QCMDEXC?  Instead of CONST isn't nothing, 
or
> VALUE required?  Judging by the error message displayed that's my
> interpretation.
>
> Rob Berendt

_______________________________________________
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.