|
I don't like having unnecessary things in my source; they clutter the source up. I don't mind that imported definitions are unreferenced, because I don't see them in the source. But I hate it when I scan for field ABCDE and I find sources where the field is defined but not used. Joep Beckeringh ----- Original Message ----- From: <rob@xxxxxxxxx> To: "RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries" <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 10:11 PM Subject: Re: Compiler listing (was: Varying - Inz mandatory?) > I am probably going to regret asking this, but here goes: > > Why do you care about unreferenced fields, and if you do so, why would it > matter if they were defined in the program or subprocedure and not the > includes, etc? > > Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.