Re: Compiler listing (was: Varying - Inz mandatory?)

I am probably going to regret asking this, but here goes:

Why do you care about unreferenced fields, and if you do so, why would it 
matter if they were defined in the program or subprocedure and not the 
includes, etc?

Rob Berendt
-- 
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary 
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." 
Benjamin Franklin 





"Joep  Beckeringh" <joep.beckeringh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
08/19/2003 02:30 PM
Please respond to RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries
 
        To:     "RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries" 
<rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
        cc: 
        Fax to: 
        Subject:        Re: Compiler listing (was: Varying - Inz 
mandatory?)


And while we're at it: I wish the compiler listing would differentiate
between unreferenced fields (RNF7031) which are defined within the program
and those that come with include members and external file definitions.

Joep Beckeringh

----- Original Message -----
From: "Buck" <buck.calabro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 12:00 AM
Subject: Compiler listing (was: Varying - Inz mandatory?)


> Yes.  Religiously.  I wish there were an API that allowed me access to 
the
> cross reference at the bottom.  It's a gold mine.
>   --buck

_______________________________________________
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.