×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




Yeah, and Hans, what would have happened if the budget for the next year 
was greater than the budget 5 years ago?  Suppose that would have really 
made a difference to Steve?  After all, that is possible.  5 years ago was 
what, V4Rsomething?  All rather big sleepers compared to V5.

Some people aren't happy until they get that "one personally important 
enhancement".

Rob Berendt
-- 
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary 
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." 
Benjamin Franklin 





Hans Boldt <boldt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
08/13/2003 02:07 PM
Please respond to RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries

 
        To:     rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
        cc: 
        Fax to: 
        Subject:        Re: v4 vs v5 rpg. was Prototypes, /COPY and LIKE()


Steve Richter wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Buck
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 11:49 AM
> To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Prototypes, /COPY and LIKE()
> 
> 
> 
>>>You have to get a laugh at the hypocracy of IBM however.
>>>On the one hand they say that RPG is dead,
> 
> 
>>Citation, please?  I have never heard IBM say RPG is dead; exactly the
>>opposite.
>> --buck
> 
> 
> You cite first!  Because of the conspiracy, there will not be any IBMers 
on
> the record stating that RPG is history.
> 
> A proc centered rpg makes features like a static free rpg very doable. 
Once
> rpg or its derivative is static free, then the language can be thread
> capable, can handle exceptions better, ...  The point being that there 
are a
> lot of ways that rpg can be improved.  Yet, there are no v4 to v5 like
> improvements planned.
> 
> What is the current year IBM r/d budget for rpg?  what was it 5 yrs ago?

Huh?

(rubs eyes in disbelief)

LOL!

This is hilarious! So a possible reduced rate of RPG enhancements 
means RPG is dead? So we not only have to continue to enhance the 
language, but do so at an *increased rate* to demonstrate that RPG 
is not dead?

Thanks Steve, you really made my day!

Cheers! Hans


_______________________________________________
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.