RE: SQL in free form work-around (was: Free form code suggestion )

["Mackie, Roger L. (Precision Press)" <RLMackie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Eric,

I seem to remember that, too. That's why I put the subprocedures in the
order I did. So far no worries in testing. If no bugs spoil the ointment, it
won't remove but might relieve the PITA somewhat. At least we won't be
stumbling over unnecessary tags.

Thanks,
Roger Mackie


-----Original Message-----
From: DeLong, Eric [mailto:EDeLong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 14:10
To: 'RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries'
Subject: RE: SQL in free form work-around (was: Free form code
suggestion )
<snip>

...as I recall, the problem was that you must keep the procedures
in a specific order within your source member so the pre-compiler would not
think that you're running the fetches before the declare cursor, and so on.
It was idiotic stuff like this that makes SQL and ILE a PITA.
<snip>