|
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Bob cozzi wrote: > That's a good point. I would suggest running one more test, this time create > the user space as something like 32k in size, but make it auto-extend. Then > read it in 32k chunks, similar to option C; and observer/report the results. > I'm wondering if there would be any difference. > If you already did that, and it was used in option A, then just let us know > that. Thanks! I think using auto-extend would invalidate the test since you would still be allocating 16MB of memory - just doing it piece by piece. Instead use a user space that is 32k and just fill and refill - just like you did with the 32k struct. James Rich
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.