|
> Buck: Would the method mentioned below still work if I need >to exit the program with *inlr off? Another word, I need the storage >to stay as it was if the program happen to be called again. Good question. I don't know the answer (never did it), but I can guess. Sending an escape message up the stack terminates 'this' program. I doubt any memory is reclaimed but it should be easy enough to test. Unfortunately, I am tied up right now. It would be great to hear the results of your testing! --buck
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.