|
>> well, just for the sake of being argumentative and the advancement of technical knowledge, if you translate from w-code up to C IBM chose to go the Java route to achieve this end. C is not that portable when you take all the run time requirements into account. With Java the toolbox classes already existed to provide the CHAIN/READ/etc. capability. So - they did exactly what you suggest - they just didn't chose to use C. Jon Paris Partner400 www.Partner400.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.