|
Rob wrote: However he did run some tests and found SQL to be faster. Was that for repeated single record retrieval, small groups, or large sets of records? Rob wrote: However it was not "faster enough" to get him to stray from traditional file access using RPG. Just to be clear, I am a big fan of embedded SQL for record retrieval. It just seems like a lot of overhead to possibly build and prepare a statement or have the query engine do it's work for a single record. Maybe I'm misunderstanding how the system handles embedded SQL though. Wouldn't be the first time. :) Rick
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.