|
>Having _not_ thought this through, could you use a "common" >header data structure with several based() structures for >the differing parts? Roughly speaking: > > d strucHeader ds > d sensType 3p 0 > d sensID 7p 0 > d roType 3p 0 > d roID 7p 0 > d DATA 5000 > > d pDATA S INZ(%addr(DATA)) > > d struc500 ds based(pDATA) > d 500Field1 3p 0 > d 500Field2 7p 0 > d 500Field3 3p 0 > > d struc360 ds based(pDATA) > d 360Field1 3A > d 360Field2 9p 0 > d 360Field3 1p 0 Good idea but it doesn't help for a couple of reasons: 1) the "common" bits are interspersed throughout each record type 2) I still need the large SELECT structure to shuffle the individual names to a single set of universal names. Thanks, Walden! --buck
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.