|
Hans,
Is the TABxxxxx prefix still a requirement when specifying tables?
-mark
Original Message: ----------------- From: Hans Boldt boldt@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 08:44:32 -0400 To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: %TLOOKUP
Dave: That message is issued for several reasons. Clearly, the 2nd parameter is a table, and so that can't be the reason. Check the definition of the search argument ARPA. The types of the first two arguments must be compatible. That is, ARPA must be of type character.
Cheers! Hans
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.