× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. March 2003

Re: Replacing *entry plist

Scott,

 Whoops, of course you're right.  I confused it w/ the PR.  But my question
still stands - what if two PI's are coded?

 -mark


Original Message:
-----------------
From: Scott Klement klemscot@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:20:54 -0600 (CST)
To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Replacing *entry plist


No.  You could NOT have multiples of those.  You don't code a PI for
QCmdExc (no matter how you spell it) and therefore it would never match.

On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, mlazarus@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>  But you could have multiples of those.  Let's say you've also added one
> for QCmdExc.  But you've spelled it incorectly: QCmdExec.  How would it
> know to use the internal program one vs. the QCmdExec one?



--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.