|
>> They MUST be the same name, (and I would suggest they be meaningful - e.g. the same name as the *MODULE). Not often I disagree with you Brian - but I would argue that "meaningful" and "same name as the *MODULE" is a direct contradiction for most shops. Modules are invariably the same name as the source which typically follows some arcane "what is the next number in the PAYRP series" type of convention. The EXTPGM is enough documentation to link the pieces. Why on earth not take advantage of the fact that the prototype can allow a truly meaningful name on the CALLP so you know what's going on. Which would you rather see CALLP PAYRP027B( ....... or CALLP EmployeePayByDept( ....... - It's no contest as far as I'm concerned! Jon Paris Partner400
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.