|
>I mean, if the offsets are the only way to >go, then why don't the buffer example just have one big field >that contains the old/new record values and tell you to use >the offsets to determine the starting and ending points, >rather than show individual fields? That technique works. You do not need pointers to use offsets. You can describe the record as a giant array and use an array index as the offset. Or you can go nuts and use substring. The idea is the same: use the "offset" values given in the trigger buffer to locate the record, and DON'T ASSUME that the record data always starts in the same place in the trigger buffer. >Thanks for the input, as I know I have more work to do. I was >just curious if there was an actual reason why I needed to >input the extra field when it wasn't illustrated in any >documented examples. Sounds like you are looking at less than stellar examples. >How many times have we fixed a program, and then not >really understood why or how we fixed it?? In my case, never. If I don't understand the code then I don't put it into production. --buck
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.