|
> From: Gary Guthrie > > Am I misperceiving you if you seem a little upset by my advice? No big deal. You said, "I don't understand how folks can come to such conclusions in such a void," as if we were handing Mike some tablets from the mountain. I was pointing out that we were just offering advice. > The questioner admittedly > didn't understand the nuances and was getting an awful lot of advice > that failed to point out ANY reasoning/rationale - just do it this way. Well frankly, our advice was valid: *NEW on top-level programs, *CALLER on others. Show me where that's a BAD thing, and maybe I'll be more amenable to your comment. > I acknowledged that the "rule of thumb" might work for a considerable > portion of the application and simply advised the questioner to not > follow the "rule of thumb" blindly. Are you opposed to that? Sure, a full analysis is the right way to do things, but there's nothing intrinsically wrong with rule of thumb advice when presented that way. You just sort of implied that we were being bad little programmers by commenting. It's all about the phrase "I don't understand how...". No biggie. It was just a "tone" thing; they crop up on a text-based list from time to time. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.