|
Gary Thornton <gthornton2003=/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> helped spread the news by saying: > I just have to ask... If the requirements to test are as strict as > you make them out to be, shouldn't your company be using a *real* QA > testing tool. Note that I have no experience with such tools, as I > have never been employed in a shop that mandated them. (snip) Well, yes, a "*real*" QA testing tool would be wonderful. But that's beyond the scope of this request. I'm looking to do my own desk-checking BEFORE it gets to the tester's desk. One thing I hate is turning in a project, only to have the tester back at my desk in 5 minutes saying the program blew up when she tried to key a customer number or that taxes shouldn't exceed the cost of the item or stuff like that. Most embarrassing. Not that it's ever happened to me... Judging from the comments and responses I've gotten, my guess is that I'm SOL. Bummer. -- David Schopp WISDM Team Leader Computers Unlimited
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
