RE: subprocedure questions

[Dan <dbcerpg@xxxxxxxxx>]

I'll go ahead and play by the "rules" and change this per your
recommendation, but, originally, I changed only the DS name and kept
the subfields in the both of the DS's the same.  Does this mean that
the two DS's occupied the same place in memory?  I'm guessing not,
because a DUMP run in the subproc shows different values for the
subfields in question.  The DUMP run from the main module shows junk in
the subproc's variables.

Interesting.

It must be time to buy a book.

TIA, Dan

--- "Haas, Matt" <Matt.Haas@thomsonlearning.com> wrote:
> Dan,
>
> If you look (and unless I mis-keyed something) both data structures
> are the same except for the names. The reason for this was to give
> the subprocedure it's own copy of the data structure to work with so
> you don't run into problems with scope. I could have easily updated
> the variables in MyDS directly, eliminating the need to even return
> anything but that's a bad thing to do since it makes the code very
> hard to debug, but this keeps it more modular so if you need to, it
> can be broken out into a service program.
>
> Matt

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos
http://launch.yahoo.com/u2