|
>Well, note that I specified edit code 3 in my example, >which drops the sign. Yup. That's why I mentioned that the original request didn't refer to negative numbers. I was bringing up the idea for the sake of broadening the solution to a more general problem set. >I understand Seth's relucatance to use %EDITW. >If the length of the database field changes, >he would have to change all his edit words. Great point; another thing to consider for a general solution. --buck
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.