Subprocedures and files

["Jon Paris" <Jon.Paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

 >> I think we approach the concept of procedures a little differently.

No I think we just completely mis-understood one another.  I had assumed
(incorrectly obviously) that being the little old tool builder that you are
you'd have written a tool to build your protos for you.  Then as they were
adapted to procs would modify them appropriately.

As to "result sets" - l simply meant the pieces of data returned by the
proc.

The point I was trying to make, which seems to have been missed completely,
was that protos have nothing to do with procedures per se - a program call
can be prototyped, as can a bound call to a "program" module, as can a
function or procedure.  I just happen to think that adding this level of
bullet proofing to the call is _always_ worth while.

Jon Paris
Partner400