|
"Joe Pluta" <joepluta=8+0R355eNL3AKuVPhbf8BAC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org> wrote in message JMEAKJHIIBLMDGOOGMGAKEBPFJAA.joepluta@PlutaBrothers.com">news:JMEAKJHIIBLMDGOOGMGAKEBPFJAA.joepluta@PlutaBrothers.com... > "Exec" is my prototype for QCMDEXC, while "OvrDbf" is my prototype to format > the OVRDBF command. This is the way programming should be! This single > line replaces 10 lines of code in my original program (two calls to external > programs) and a couple of work variables. Why invoke QCMDEXC in the first level call? Why not just have OvrDbf format the command and call QCMDEXC itself? That way you've hidden the implementation and the invocation. As a first level consumer, I don't care HOW something is done, I just care that it IS done. david
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.