|
-----Original Message----- From: rpg400-l-admin@midrange.com [mailto:rpg400-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Buck Calabro >I can't speak for the compiler team, but I have a similar situation using >production code in our ERP product. >Imagine version 7 of the product installed at a customer site. That version >has it's own database file structure, etc. In the course of development for >ver. 8 I create an internal API that is built over information stored in >database files that were changed from ver. 7. My ver. 7 customers would >love to have that functionality, but I can't ship it to them because it >would require me to change part of their database to ver. 8. Hi Buck, But if your product was modular, that is each module is self contained, does not depend on the other modules ... your v8 database module would provide interfaces that could be used by a v7 code module. That is what ILE is touted as being. The p/w-code output by the v5r1 rpg compiler should be able to be compiled down to the *prv release. My technical question is, what is the technical reason for the this? Was w-p-code enhanced in v5r1 to accomodate LIKEDS and QUALIFIED? And even if the intermediate code was enhanced in v5r1, shouldnt ILE still accomodate this. One ILE ILE compliant machine code module calling another through their established interfaces? Steve Richter
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.