|
>I think you are on the right track however >I disagree with your methodology. Instead of >adding yet another chain, (with it's potential >for corrupting the input buffer, unless you >prefix, etc), shouldn't we be evaluating the >failure on the WRITE? Good alternative. On S/38, monitoring for a failure was about 100 times more expensive than the chain. I need to update my thinking. --buck
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.