RE: Qualified sub-procedures -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: Qualified sub-procedures
From: Jim Langston <jlangston@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 11:29:24 -0700
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l/>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l>,<mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l>,<mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Question on this statement, Hans:

> IMHO, OO is not a very good fit for compiled languages like RPG and
> COBOL and C.  On the other hand, OO really hits its stride in
> interpreted languages like Object REXX, Python, Smalltalk, and Ruby.

I'm a C++ programmer.  Are you saying that OO is not well done in C++?  Or that 
it could be better?  Or just what are you saying?

Right now C++ is my langauge of choice, and if it's a bad choice I'd like to 
know.

Regards,

Jim Langston

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Qualified sub-procedures , Hans Boldt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.