RE: ILE philosophy

[Scott Mildenberger <Smildenber@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

See inline.

Scott Mildenberger

> -----Original Message-----
> From: M. Lazarus [mailto:mlazarus@ttec.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 9:28 AM
> To: rpg400-l@midrange.com
> Subject: Re: ILE philosophy
>
>
>   If you have worked w/ a "real" ILE application (and you
> probably have), I
> think that you'll admit that the development environment is
> not even close
> to what it needs to be.  There are *way* too many manual
> steps, info that
> is clumsy to get at, etc.

What are the steps you refer to.  I just don't see that it is that diffucult
to manage.  What am I missing that you are referring to.


>
>   A "real" integrated MAKE tool is a no-brainer as a requirement.  I
> believe that this is *one* of the reasons that it's taken a
> long time for
> ILE to catch on - it's a more difficult environment to
> manage, but I don't
> think that it has to be that way.
>

I don't miss a MAKE tool that much.  I can only think that it would be real
useful if you bind modules by copy.  Since I don't advocate that approach I
don't see much need for a MAKE tool.