RE: ILE philosophy

[Buck Calabro <Buck.Calabro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>In my mind, I imagine ILE to be a four tiered hierarchy:
>
>Binding Directory (one or many) has
>         Service Program (one or many) has
>                 Module (one or many) has
>                         Function (one or many)
>
>I realize that more arrangements can be made than
>this, but this seems principally how I can see it working.

Your description is fine.  Bear in mind that the run time requirements
should drive the service program activation group attribute.

>Right now, my biggest issue with the whole deal
>comes down to managing the service programs.

I want to clearly state that the following is strictly my own opinion, and
may not represent best practise.  If you need more than 5 or 6 service
programs I'd be surprised.  In a very large application you might make it to
a dozen or so.

>A 'make' utility might go a long way towards
>making the system work efficiently.

I haven't looked at it in ages, but there is a MAKE tool in IBM's QUSRTOOL.
It requires C, but if you're on V5 you are entitled to a no extra charge C
license.
  --buck