|
HAns, >In this particular case, I'd suggest spending $20 on the item, with >an explanation written on your ballot as to what your specific need >is. Will do. >I'm just *brainstorming* here, but one possible design might be to >have a (P) opcode extender on the EVALC opcode, Seems to me it would be nicer to use some DS level keyword. This way you'd only have to do it once (not on each EVALC), and it would easily handle differences in prefix lengths. It would also not look like a (P)ad operation extender for moves. >Now is not the time to get into too much detailed design. I understand -- I was just trying to qualify if I should consider voting for it. Thanks, Doug
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.