Re: It's That Time Again! The 2002 RPG Enhancement Poll

"Bartell, Aaron L. (TC)" wrote:
>
> Hans,
>
> Why don't we number them from most wanted to least wanted?  So if I really
> want multi-dimensional arrays I would give it a [1].  And I would then give
> "Keyword TEMPLATE to define DS without allocating storage." a [20], because
> I don't really have a use for it.
>
> I have the same struggle that everybody else is having.  I would really like
> to see some of this stuff happen, but if I only get $100 then you may never
> know that I would really like to see free-form expanded beyond 80
> characters.
>

Pardon me for jumping in, but we already know that most of the items are
desirable to most people.  So we want to know what you want most.  I'm
glad that we managed to set the prices in a way that is forcing you to
choose.

Remember that it's not the individual ballots that we're interested in.
It's the sum of the information in all of them.  If A and B are both
desirable but too expensive to pick together, then chances are that A
will be more desirable for some and B will be more desirable for
others.  If you pick A and thus can't pick B, and then nobody else picks
B, then it wouldn't matter if you had been able to pick B anyway, since
your single pick would have been a faint cry in the wilderness.

Barbara