× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. July 2002

Re: %trim

It was just discussed here about a month ago, here are
some messages from the threads:

http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l/200206/msg00228.html
http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l/200206/msg00224.html

To read the entire thread, you can click on "Thread Index" in the top
right corner of the thread.

As for whether or not it's "big user of CPU" that you would depend
entirely on what you're comparing it to.   In comparison to writing your
own routine to strip the blanks off, %trim is very efficient.  However,
a routine that accomplishes the same thing without the need for stripping
the blanks will be need less CPU.


On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, JJW wrote:

> Hi *ALL
>
> We recently had IBM do an analysis of some of our most
> used programs in terms of CPU usage.  One of the things
> they mentioned was that %trim was a big user of CPU.  Has
> anyone heard this about %trim before?
>
> TIA!!!

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.