|
Bob Cozzi wrote: > Do you mean that because a VARYING field is usually set to a length that > is at or close to the same length of the data, that the result is that > %trim has to do less work and therefore finishes quicker (typically) > than when it works with a fixed length field? Since %TRIM() is often used to determine the length of a string, and since varying length variables hold the actual length, %TRIM() is generally unnecessary when doing string operations on varying length values. (BTW, I'm sure it would be possible to improve the performance of %TRIM() for the worst cases, with some degradation of performance for the best cases. But you'd *never* get to the same level of performance that you'd get by using varying length character variables.) Hans
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.