|
Hi Jenny, Welcome to our world! <g> >Also as someone fairly new to programming I find it surprising when >people say why code in REXX when other people won't know it, why >maintain SQL code if your an RPG programmer, why learn about the >logic cycle if it wasn't taught etc. One of the best things about >programming is learning new things isn't it? That's what keeps the >mind interested. I think that the RPG400-L community as a whole *is*, in fact, more aggressive in learning and utilizing multiple languages than the general AS/400 IT population. Most of the negative comments regarding the use of a new/unused language *usually* stems from an ugly, but recurring, business reality. Some like to call it the "Mack truck syndrome"; if I'm doing a lot of programming in REXX and I get hit today by a Mack truck, who's going to maintain my code? Frankly, since there aren't that many AS/400 professionals that know REXX, most companies would probably scrap my REXX apps and start from scratch. That is why most companies keep a tight rein on the tools they allow their programmers to use. So, what is the AS/400 professional to do? Keep learning, dabble in the new stuff when you can, keep your ears perked for an opportunity that makes using the new stuff much more advantageous than using the shop standard, and offer to teach your colleagues what you've learned. Just my $.02. - Dan Bale (I am *NOT* "Dale" http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/200105/msg00281.html ) SAMSA, Inc. 989-790-0507 DBale@SAMSA.com <mailto:DBale@SAMSA.com> Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -----Original Message----- From: rpg400-l-admin@midrange.com [mailto:rpg400-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Mauger, Jenny Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 3:59 AM To: 'rpg400-l@midrange.com' Subject: RE: Difference bet. Primary and Full procedural file. Dear All, Thank you for all you responses to this post. As a 'newbie' myself I had read about the logic cycle but in manuals that described what the cycle did fairly briefly. I have yet to come across it in programs. Also like others on the list I was always warned off the cycle by more experienced programmers. However, having read your mails I agree with Doug, this looks like a brilliant way to code level breaks. I have a program to write that could use this very well, maybe I'll have a go at coding using the logic cycle today... It is much easier to see what is going on at a glance. I think anyone arguing that full procedural file breaks are easier are just trying desperately to cling to their corner. As a beginner I find it takes far longer to work out what is happening in a do it yourself code than in Doug's example. Also as someone fairly new to programming I find it surprising when people say why code in REXX when other people won't know it, why maintain SQL code if your an RPG programmer, why learn about the logic cycle if it wasn't taught etc. One of the best things about programming is learning new things isn't it? That's what keeps the mind interested. Thanks, Jenny
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.