|
Nelson wrote [regarding sanity checking all inputs]: >In a perfect world, I certainly agree with you. >I've just never seen such an application in >real life. I suppose if you were a vendor >that had the luxury of constantly working on >and improving the same application over and >over, for years on end.........sigh I hear you about retrofitting. Very loud and very clear. What has happened to me personally is that when I get 'one of those' screens where people make lots of mistakes, I add the edit checking. It's an incremental process rather than a complete re-do. Training people to use the keyboard properly isn't really an unreasonable expectation. After all, somebody explained how to sign on, press Error Reset, etc. Line people have managers, and if the data suggest that Mr Oopsie makes more than his fair share of data entry mistakes, then Mr Oopsie's manager should take a moment to find out why. This is one place I actually made some points in a prior job. When an anxious warehouse manager called me to find out 'what idiot ordered 100000 cases of toilet paper' it was a bit of work to track down the offending order, but two good things came of it: 1) We put an 'are you sure?' window in the entry program 2) We found that we were putting employees in the field without proper training, so we updated our 'when we hire people do this' list It isn't hopeless at all! --buck "This box Rocks!" - related to 2002 NE IBM Conference attendees by IBM's Stephanie Joy
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.