RE: FW: Keyword on DSPF entry field

Point taken on the tone of the post, Joe, and I apologize to the list for
that.  I didn't realize it would come across that way.

The reason for the second post was that it appeared no one was taking the
original question as a serious one.  Generally, the most trivial of
questions receive a lot of responses here.  I believe though that the first
response I did receive got it right when he said no one had responded
because there was no good solution to the problem.  But if you thought the
original was a newbie post, wouldn't that be more reason to help rather than
less?  I hope we don't become too elitist to help newbies.  I've always seen
just the opposite in the past here.

BTW, I've been dealing with the 5250 interface since 1979, but I don't have
an answer to this particular problem.  If that makes me a newbie, so be it.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Pluta [SMTP:joepluta@PlutaBrothers.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:53 AM
> To:   rpg400-l@midrange.com
> Subject:      RE: FW: Keyword on DSPF entry field
>
> I'd like to offer a little constructive criticism here.  Take it as you
> will, or ignore it.
>
> First, those of us who have been programming in this field know perfectly
> well that this is a side effect of the 5250 interface.  Anybody who's done
> any work with the 5250 has seen this, and any 5250 user understands it.
> The
> only people who don't know this basic fact of 5250 communications are
> people
> who have never dealt with it.  Some of us may not have responded because
> it's perfectly obvious to those of us who have actually worked with the
> interface, and we didn't have the time or inclination to respond to an
> obvious newbie post.
>
> Second, the fact that your management won't pay for you to get support to
> fix your programs is really not our concern.  PPOYPDNCACOMP.  Poor
> planning
> on your part does not create a crisis on my part.  If you don't like the
> response time you get from this list, we'll gladly refund the money you
> paid.
>
> Finally, the DEMANDING part is pretty annoying.  This crap about "C'mon,
> guys.  This is a real production problem we have, and I've had no
> responses
> from anyone, yet."  Guess what, Nelson?  You might not get any!  We aren't
> here to answer your questions in your time frame.  The post about
> "software
> support contracts" has to do with the fact that this list is VOLUNTARY,
> unlike a support contract which you pay for.  Since this list is voluntary
> (and free), if you post a question here, it may or may not get answered.
> And whether or not your question gets answered may be based to some degree
> on your attitude.
>
> Just some thoughts.
>
> Joe
>
>


************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
This message originates from Lincare Holdings Inc. It contains information 
which maybe confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual 
or entity named above.
It is prohibited for anyone else to disclose, copy, distribute or use the 
contents of this message.
All personal messages express views solely of the sender, which are not to be 
attributed to Lincare Holdings Inc., and may not be copied or distributed 
without this disclaimer.
If you received this message in error, please notify us immediately at 
MailAdmin@lincare.com or (800) 284-2006.
************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************