|
I got off the phone after talking to a group of people at IBM regarding the SQL precompiler. In general many suggestions may not make it into the release after V5R1, but a release after that. Some are so expensive that they may be on that 'outstanding requirement' list for awhile. They may publish another survey at iseriesnetwork circa 4q 2002. They do listen to the customers. But the customers have to tell them (and not by writing it on a bathroom wall in a rest stop on I80). Key ways of communicating include COMMON, some third party developers and Design Change Requests. So I guess I am lobbying for more DCR's on things you feel need improvement. The more they get then the more they feel the customers need a particular feature. Once again, the link to DCR's is at: http://www-912.ibm.com/s_dir/slkbase.nsf/1ac66549a21402188625680b0002037e/3ca7d5dfc681aa86862565c500526323?OpenDocument&Highlight=0,5314847 Issues I've recently had to deal with include: SQL precompiler lack of support for local variables SQL precompiler lack of support for qualified variables Allowing the use of nested /COPY Allowing the use of local cursors Allow the use of cursors in recursion via subprocedures Fully support the I integer data type (ptf pending) Support the prefix keyword on external data structures Support arrays as host variables Support the use of logical, or 'N', variables. Rob Berendt -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.