|
Dave, When this MCH message appeared? Immediately, or after long time? Because I've tested my application and it works fine without USROPN. (V4R5 system) By the way, setting *ON *INLR in service program will not close files... Marcin Drozdowski -----Original Message----- From: Leland, David [mailto:dleland@Harter.com] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 10:06 PM To: 'rpg400-l@midrange.com' Subject: RE: SRVPGM: USROPN file or not This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] I am very curious about this as well because I created a SRVPGM with a file and didn't specify USROPN (and didn't do any explicit OPENs or CLOSEs). I also didn't seton LR when exiting the SRVPGM (leaving the files open) and this caused problems - I don't recall the exact message but it was an MCH message and it indicated that the SRVPGM (or resources) was destroyed. So, I changed the program to USROPN and explicitly OPENed the file upon entry into the SRVPGM and explicitly CLOSEed it after using it. I don't like doing this because it burns more CPU time but it took care of the problem. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Lutz [mailto:alutz@pmigroup.com] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 4:00 PM To: rpg400-l@midrange.com Subject: RE: SRVPGM: USROPN file or not Wrong, as you observed it will be opened automatically What the compiler is warning you about is the need to close the file 'manually' (if that is what you want to do) because you have NOMAIN. >>> marcin.drozdowski@big.pl 03/07/02 12:42PM >>> So Service PGM shouldn't open a file automatically, when no USROPN is specified, right? (Because it have no RPG cycle embedded) But it does, during first call. I've checked it. Marcin Drozdowski -----Original Message----- From: Bob Cozzi (RPGIV) [mailto:cozzi@rpgiv.com] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 9:18 PM To: rpg400-l@midrange.com Subject: RE: SRVPGM: USROPN file or not User Controlled Open (USROPN) gives you the ability to avoid having RPG IV automatically open the file for you, using the RPG cycle. Service program do not have an RPG Cycle embedded in them. The ability to use the OPEN and CLOSE operation codes has nothing to do with the USROPN keyword. A file could be opened outside of the program or in your case, Service program. Bob Cozzi cozzi@rpgiv.com Visit the on-line Midrange Developer forum at: http://www.rpgiv.com > -----Original Message----- > From: rpg400-l-admin@midrange.com [mailto:rpg400-l-admin@midrange.com] On > Behalf Of Andrew Lutz > Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 1:49 PM > To: rpg400-l@midrange.com > Subject: Re: SRVPGM: USROPN file or not > > Would you ever want to close the file? > > If the answer is yes, then USROPN is the way to go. > > > > Andrew Lutz > Database Administrator > (916) 851-7140 > alutz@pmigroup.com > > > >>> marcin.drozdowski@big.pl 03/07/02 11:40AM >>> > Procedure in my SRVPGM is called frequently, both from batch (server) > and interactive jobs. RPGLE programs are running in named activation group. > IMHO it's good idea _not_ to declare files in SRVPGM with USROPN, but > compiler says: "Files should be closed explicitly when NOMAIN is > specified on the Control specification". > The message has severity 10 and SRVPGM is created. > Will it have any bad influences? > > Thanks for advice. > Marcin Drozdowski >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.