|
Rob, > And one software developer asked at his conference if the users would have > a problem if they stopped supporting releases earlier than XYZ. The users > cheered and applauded. Now they had justification to management to upgrade > their 400's. Surprised the developer to no end. Back to the practical world, although I would love to have a new machine IBM's desire to make the 400 a Java wonderland (green screen penalty!), quick drop of support for old releases (no need for software support either), inability of existing machine to handle new releases (no need for software subscription either) and a greedy ERP vendor that considers any upgrade a chance to grind out lots of additional revenue justification is a very long, very expensive road... So I hereby declare my love for support of old releases of everything and await the time that "everyone" agrees there are enough features and function in a new system to justify the cost. To be honest my current 620 is an awful lot alike the System 38 Model 3 I got back in 1980! If we need state of the art we will convert those functions to NT / Win2K / Java / Unix etc and gather the benefit of the rich toolsets and choice that those platforms offer. Konrad
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.