|
My concern when using QADBIFLD is that IBM could change the format in a future release, causing the program to stop working.. (Or have they documented that this won't change?) You wouldn't have that problem with QUSLFLD... it's designed so that they can make changes and still keep things backwards-compatible. On Fri, 4 Jan 2002 rob@dekko.com wrote: > > My stock and standard reply to this is that why use DSPFFD or QUSLFLD when > you can use traditional i/o against the file QSYS/QADBIFLD to get this > information? >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.