|
On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 16:06, rob@dekko.com wrote: > > My stock and standard reply to this is that why use DSPFFD or QUSLFLD when > you can use traditional i/o against the file QSYS/QADBIFLD to get this > information? > > Rob Berendt Rob I would have agreed with you until my code failed to compile on John Ross' Netshare400 box. No user access to QADBIFLD :( I've had reports from others installing my code that this was a problem for them as well. That's why I switched to QUSLFLD - well, that and the chance to learn something new :) Regards, Martin -- martin@dbg400.net / jamaro@firstlinux.net http://www.dbg400.net DBG/400 - DataBase Generation utilities Open Source test environment tools for the AS/400 / iSeries and miscellaneous database & spooled file management commands.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
