|
>> If IBM, in their infinite wisdom :-), left the cycle available, why not use it. Well I for one wanted to drop it when we did RPG IV - but I accepted that for compatibility reasons we needed to leave it in there. Besides, it was more work to remove it from the compiler that we used as the base for RPG IV that it was to leave it there!! My personal hope was that no one would write new stuff using it ..... but ....... Jon Paris Partner400
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.