RE: Cycle Processing vs. Doing it my way -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: Cycle Processing vs. Doing it my way
From: MWalter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 08:21:29 -0500
List-Archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l/>
List-Help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-Id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-Post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l>,<mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l>,<mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I agree with Reeve. Use the best tool for the job. I have true ILE
(modules, service programs,sub programs)  programs that contain a modules
that read primary and secondary files with matched records. If IBM, in
their infinite wisdom :-), left the cycle available, why not use it.
Please, no arguments for GOTO CABEQ or LEAVE.


Thanks,

Mark


Mark Walter
Sr. Programmer/Analyst
Hanover Wire Cloth a div of CCX, Inc.
mwalter@hanoverwire.com
http://www.hanoverwire.com
717.637.3795 Ext.3040

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.