|
James, John, all, The choice of license is very crucial. They all have their good points and their bad points. It all depends on what your objective is. You may want to take a look at http://www.opensource.org at the variety of licenses that are available. (And it doesn't hurt if you can read "legalese") IMHO, if you want to write a module that anyone can use in their home grown apps, by all means make it GPL. On the other hand it is a "poison pill" to anyone wanting to incorporate it into a commercial application because the GPL requires that their entire app become GPL. The Mozilla (Netscape) license, and the Open Source/400 General Open Source Public License (GOSPL), which is based upon the Mozilla license, permit commercial use with appropriate disclaimers and acknowledgments. Therefore a commercial enterprise can not mention their product without also stating that it includes open source "free" software. At the same time it allows a commercial enterprise to build upon your work and spread your name. Sort of like winning the lottery. If you read the fine print they can use your photo for promotional purposes. At the same time that they promote themselves, they promote you. Like I said before, there are good points and bad points. IMO, having my photo appear in a lottery ad is right next to having it show up on a milk carton! ;-) Now, this is different than having Linux as a GPL and the use of IBM's UDB within Linux. IBM's UDB is not a modification of Linux and is therefore not subject to the GPL. IBM's choice to make UDB "freeware" is a whole lot different than making it "open source". Once one makes a piece of software "open source" they must be willing to abandon the direction and control of the software. The software project takes on a life of it's own. At best, you retain a stewardship role so long as the participants grant you that privilege. James David Rich wrote: > On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, John Ross wrote: > > > Ok, it is open source. I am not sure if it needs to be released with one of > > the open source licenses or not. And if so which one. I want to do some > > other open source projects so this will be a good place to start and work > > out some of the kinks of handling open source projects. > > Please use the GNU GPL with open projects. It makes integration with > various distributions of linux much easier. It also protects your work > and everyone else's. +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.