× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: using a defined constant to dimension an array
  • From: Joel Fritz <JFritz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 12:33:01 -0700

I'm confused about something I stumbled on this morning with array
definitions.  I want to pass an array to a procedure and I define the
procedure as follows:

Prototype--

D pushmode        pr              n                               
D entry                               like(mode) const            
D stack                               like(mode) dim(MAXMODE)     
D top                                 like(modetop)               
D 

Procedure interface--
P pushmode        b
D pushmode        pi              n                               
D entry                               like(mode) const            
D stack                               like(mode) dim(MAXMODE)     
D top                                 like(modetop)               
D                                                                 

MAXMODE is a constant defined before the procedure prototypes in the source
file.  It looks like this:

D MAXMODE         C                   const(50)         

The compile fails with various errors relating to the procedure definition
centering around the use of MAXMODE.  My favorite is: 

*RNF3764 30        027300  Definition of parameter (A(10)) not same as
definition of                                
                           parameter in prototype (A(10) DIM(50)).    


It looks like the compiler sees the named constant in the prototype, but not
in the actual procedure definition.  The program compiles fine if I
dimension the array in the procedure definition using a numeric literal. (I
didn't try using something other than 50, though.)  Is this the way it ought
to work?  Is a named constant less global than a variable, or does this have
to do with the behavior of the DIM keyword in a procedure definition versus
a D spec in a MAIN program?                                              
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.