Can you take module binding to far?

["Jade Richtsmeier" <jade.richtsmeier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Greetings -

We are trying to implement ILE concepts along with modularization.  My
question is, when have you taken binding do far?

Here's what we have:

PgmA contains the following modules:
PgmA = RPG entry point program
PgmAc = CL program to start commitment control
PgmAs1 = subfile server in order number sequence
PgmAs2 = subfile server in customer name sequence
PgmAs3 = subfile server in customer number sequence
PgmB = Flat panel maintenance for the order header
PgmBedt = Editing server program for order header
PgmC = Order detail subfile
PgmCs1 = subfile server for order detail
PgmD = Flat panel maintenance for order detail
PgmDedt = Editing server for order detail

Beings that there isn't any reason to access the detail data without the
header information, where do you draw the line at binding modules into one
program?  Is there a rule of thumb for the number of modules bound into one
program?

Any info would be appreciated.

TIA,
Jade Richtsmeier
Analyst/Programmer
MN Counties Information Systems
Grand Rapids, MN

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---