Re: Because it's there... (Was: Printer Overflow and BIF's)

You ask "Would this bug anyone else, or was this just a bee in my bonnet?"
MOST DEFINITELY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Too many questions/statements come to mind.
These changes were obviously made AFTER you had placed this for USER/ACCEPTANCE 
testing (or even worse - it was in PRODUCTION). Again obviously where was the 
security that would forbid these changes to be made within those regions. 
(Auditors would have a field day with this)
Even if this was not the case, obviously these changes WERE NOT tested.
Where was this change request made?
By whom?
Why?
Do you see where I'm going with this? 
A change was made to a program, but when a problem occurs, the person making 
the last change is NOT the one contatced. 
Can anyone say AUDIT TRAIL, change management etc.


>>> Jim Langston <jimlangston@conexfreight.com> 05/02/01 12:11PM >>>
I know what you mean, Jim.

I use new techniques in all my programs because I can, then I have to
decide if they make for better programming or not.  I guess, to paraphrase
an explorer who climbed Everest and I forget his name, because they're there.

I wrote a program lately that this list helped me on, dealing with subfiles,
all in RPG IV (was no need to do any linking in this one) with subprocedures
instead of subroutines, all variables declared in the D specs, the only MOVE
statements having to do with validating dates, etc...

Then I got a call that my program was "broken".  Giving a pointer error when
it started.  No way.  I run the program, pointer error.  Run it in debug, it's
now expecting entry parms which I didn't code.  I find out that some other
program in another site wanted to call this program with the invoice number to
display.  So I looked at the changes she had made.

D              DS
D inv#                1     8
D inv2                2     8

C     *entry   plist
C              parm          #inv#      8

C              move  #inv#   inv#
C              movel inv2#   DFInv 

Blech!  You take my nice RPG IV program and stick this RPG II/PRG III junk into
it?  So I changed it.

D ParmInv#                 8A

C     *Entry  PList
C             Parm        ParmInv#

C             Eval        DFInv# = %SubSt(ParmInv#: 2: 7)

then I fix it and the calling CL and, surprise surprise, I test it!

Everything worked and everyone was happy, especially me knowing my code was
"clean" again.

Would this bug anyone else, or was this just a bee in my bonnet?

Regards,

Jim Langston

Me transmitte sursum, Caledoni!

> "Sneddon, Jim" wrote:
> 
> Peter,
> 
> I'm sorry - I forgot that little detail.
> 
> It is an externally described printer file.
> 
> It works (of course) by using an OFLIND(*IN55) and then watching for *in55.  
>I was not able to get it to work by using the %error method and it won't let 
>you specify something like OFIND(%ERROR)...  I did not think of setting an 
>OFLIND and then watching for %error but I doubt it will work - I'll give it a 
>try just for grins.
> 
> So it works with the old method and everyone is happy (as happy as end-users 
>will ever be)  but I was just curious if I could take advantage of some new 
>method using the BIF's instead.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> >Printer Overflow and BIF's
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com 
+---

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---